In an unprecedented move, the Chinese legislative arm has empowered elderly parents who feel frustrated and weakened by their adult children’s gross neglect by passing into law a “Parent Abandonment Bill.” Adult children are now legally required to visit their old parents and show some love, or have charges pressed against them by said parents.
Japanese Culture and other civilizations,
This is the Clash, enen with Chinese,
I love crash things,
I am living in Colombo 7, Sri Lanka.
And I can see several times near my house, Colombo Art Museum as "Nelum Pokuna Mahinda Rajapaksa Theatre" built by Charlie's ODA finance.
And I saw several Charlie's flags and only one, just only one Sri Lanka flag....
Anyway, you Srilankan don't do mind, it's OK for me...., I don't mind it....
Follow Charlie's....(・o・)
The US interest in an Asian island dispute
(↓This is not true, Japan don't make any problem about such small islands. Charlie / Charlie's government like to create this crisis.)
The tension in the East China Sea between China and Japan is America’s problem. Sure, there are all sorts of reasons war will “never” break out — from “it just wouldn’t make sense” to “everybody is making too much money to fight.”But given the history of the region and the lack of rules for handling such crises, the reality is that one stupid mistake could start a war. Since the United States is obligated by treaty to defend Japan if it is attacked, it falls to Washington to make sure a conflict does not erupt.Over the past several months, Tokyo and Beijing have played a game of chicken, in the streets, on the seas, in the air and through the airwaves over a cluster of three uninhabited islands and two big rocks called the Senkakus by the Japanese and the Diaoyu Islands by the Chinese.
(↓This is not true, this news' writer believe Charlie's propaganda. Charlie's government never have any enforcement for Senkaku Islands since 14C.)
Japan seized them in January 1895, during its first modern war with China (which Japan won).
(↑Yes, they loose.... Every time, when they wanna fight to developed countries even from Roman Ara. They will loose it. In last time, Mao Zedong could win for us without US/UK help? Never!)
Tensions began escalating last year and have grown from anti-Japanese protests in Chinese cities to a war of words to the present situation, in which an increasing number of Chinese and Japanese ships and planes are frequenting a very small area in the East China Sea.The Japanese government announced Tuesday that twice in the past three weeks Chinese warships have upped the ante even further by “painting” a Japanese warship and helicopter with the same type of radar used to aim missiles.
[English contents, China, Charlie, Politics]
Daddy's Movie and my dream....
We won't be looked down on
Charlie, really you wanna fight with us? ; Japan Says China Aimed Military Radar at Ship
by such Charlie's government's provocation,
depend on our annihilation,
to exist,
Do not cheat your nations, think about your domestic problems,
Do not avert your nation's eyes to diplomatic issue,
Charlie, you have enough trouble in domestics,
Otherwise,
we're fighting for our right to live
and should we win the day again for Charlie,
we will not go quietly into the night!,
we will not vanish without a fight!,
Charlie, we are not fresh meat, you know? You wanna fight us again?
we're going to live on,
we're going to survive.
We will celebrate our real independence day since 1945....
"For nearly 15 years the Chinese government has been talking about improving the air quality in Beijing and by its own measures it seems to have done a pretty good job...",
What? GJ? ↓ like this condition is GJ?....(・o・)
Hmmmmmmm....
Well, not my country....
But, "Concern rises as China’s air pollution blown over Japan"....
....OMG!
Of course, this is serious situation for them....
Chinese couple with cute mask, at Tiananmen Square, Beijing, China But, Chinese are great races, they can survive.
Maybe, China will be No.1 GDP country for future, if nations can survive....(・o・)
At least, Chinese politicians, military guys, rich family will survive exactly....(・o・)
?
Or they will migrate to US?....(・o・)
China, over four thousand years history, biggest population in the world, No.2 GDP country,....etc., they are taking greatest pride in their country/races,
and, everything explode! ....even lighter! unbelievable!....(・o・),
Everything explode, China
Longest Chinese river in became red,
Red River, China
People are fighting all over the places like Roman arena, Colosseum, killing each together,
There are deadly air pollution all over main Chinese cities,
Beijing’s air pollution as seen from space
Nose Hair Map, Aisa/China
Invading other countries' land,
Clinton stands by Japan on China island row
Their handicapped new born babies are more than 10%, and now I present you,
中国、四千年の歴史、
[English contents/Japanese contents, China]
この国に誰が住みたいと思うのであろうか？
少なくとも、私は住みたくない....(・o・)
China!
Cats Fight!
....for seat!
They wanna seat so much....(・o・)
QUESTION: China?
MS. NULAND: Yeah.
QUESTION: Last Friday, Secretary Clinton sent a clear message against China about same type of issue. And right after that, spokesman of the Chinese Government criticized that comment strongly and then also invaded Japanese territorial water again and again. So how do you response this action and comment by the Chinese Government?
MS. NULAND: Well, the comments that the Secretary made on Friday when Foreign Minister Kishida was here reflected the longstanding U.S. position on this. Frankly, there was nothing new in the comments that she made. They were simply a reiteration of where we have been, starting with the fact that we don’t see any solution to this problem unless and until Japan and China sit down and work it out through dialogue. So in that context, we are happy to see a high-level envoy from the Abe Administration being received in Beijing, and we hope that that is the start of a real process of dialogue between the countries.Please.
QUESTION: Yeah. I’d like to follow up on that question. Apparently in this Xinhua commentary, they said Mrs. Clinton – not referring directly to Mrs. Clinton, but saying U.S. officials were irresponsible concerning these islands and that the irresponsible remarks would worsen rather than relieve tension on this issue. How does the State Department respond in such a comment?
MS. NULAND: Again, I think I’ve just responded in saying that the Secretary was simply reiterating the longstanding position of the United States on this situation, a position that we’ve made clear to both governments, and rather than pointing their concern at us, the Chinese ought to be working with the Government of Japan to try to resolve these issues through dialogue.
QUESTION: Do you have any contact with Chinese Government after her comment?
MS. NULAND: Well, obviously we have contact through our Embassy. We have contact through Assistant Secretary Campbell. As you know, he was recently there. I guess he wasn’t there on this last trip, but he’s in regular contact. We had Cui Tiankai here just the week before.
MS. JENSEN: Our next question comes from Jana Sehnalkova: Despite toning down recently the tensions in South China Sea, seems to have toned down, what are the U.S. priorities with respect to this area, and how can the U.S. motivate China to be a responsible stakeholder in the area, if this term is still valid? Thank you.MR. SULLIVAN: The United States’ position with respect to the South China Sea has been clear and consistent since the Secretary laid it out back in Hanoi in 2010. We want to see the peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea consistent with fundamental principles of international law. We want to see a code of conduct between ASEAN and China that governs activities in the South China Sea to reduce the prospect for conflict or discord between the parties and increases the chances that there can be cooperation around economic development, freedom of navigation, unimpeded lawful commerce, and the like.The United States has a fundamental interest in seeing these things happen. Nearly half the world’s merchant tonnage flows through the South China Sea. And from an economic perspective and a security prospective, this is very much in our national interest, so we are going to speak out on the issue and we are going to engage all of the parties on the issue.But ultimately it is about supporting a process between ASEAN and China, a serious process, that produces that code of conduct. And we would like to see that happen in the near term, because the risk of conflict, the risk of coercion, the risk of force in the area remains real. And the best way to deal with it is through effective diplomacy combined with a commitment by every party in the region, including China, to commit to international law principles and to take their claims and hold them up against those principles so that the whole world can see what it is that is behind the claim that any country is making to a particular piece of territory.
That’s how the United States approaches the issue in the South China Sea. We take no position on sovereignty or on the territorial claims that are being made, but we very much take a position on the principles that I’ve just outlined, on freedom of navigation, on the rules of international law, and on the need for this issue to be effectively dealt with so that all of the countries can have greater confidence in the peace, security, and stability of the South China Sea region.
